home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: mforget@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca (Michel Forget)
- Subject: Re: Proposal and Shift Control A
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 1994 01:39:16 -0600
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
- In <memo.289187@cix.compulink.co.uk>, Ofir Gal writes:
- [Subject: Re: Proposal and Shift Control A]
-
- [> In-Reply-To: <9406032147.AA09620=avg@mijt.cwi.nl>
-
- [> Same here. It makes the mail list so much easier to cope with.
-
- True, but it is not easy to do from within my newsreader.
-
- [> >We definitely need the reverse search next. Just the radio button isn't
- [> >sufficient. It is annoying to have to open a dialog for that.
- [>
- [> OK, I'm thinking about this.
-
- It is quite important; one person suggested the perfect keypress
- for it. If Control+UNDO is a reverse UNDO, why not have Control+G
- for "Reverse Find Next"?
-
- [> In message <2smnh1$2r5@crl.crl.com>, s.sanders2@genie.geis.com said:
- [> >
- [> >Some keyboard equivalents that I don't believe were on the list that
- [> >should be considered are SHIFT-Help (Enter context sensitive mode,
- [> >i.e. click to get help on a button or object), SHIFT-CTRL-C (Copy
- [> >from...) and SHIFT-CTRL-V (Paste to...).
- [>
- [> I forgot about the SHift+Help one. I'll add it to my propsal. I don't
- [> understand the other two.
-
- I think he meant those last to options would copy from the clipboard to
- a new file, and paste from the clipboard to a new file. I do not really
- see how they would be useful, though.
-
- [> Bye,
- [> Ofir ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk
-
- --
- () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ()
- () Michel Forget / Electric Storm Software () My cat stole my ()
- () mforget@elfhaven.ersys.edmonton.ab.ca () opinions, and pawned ()
- () ess@tibalt.supernet.ab.ca () them off for milk. ()
- () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ()
-
-